2016, Volume 69 - Issue 3
RSS feed citation: at CitEc
Publication date: 01 August 2016
MILITARY SPENDING-HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION NEXUS: A HETEROGENEOUS PANEL DATA APPROACHRead the article
CAUSALITY BETWEEN OIL PRICE AND SOUTH AFRICA'S FOOD PRICE: TIME VARYING APPROACHRead the article
LIBERALIZATION OF TRADE WITH THE EFTA COUNTRIES: SOME EVIDENCE FROM BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINARead the article
DETERMINANTS OF WESTERN BALKAN EMIGRATION FLOWS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSISRead the article
Emmanuel ANORUO, Department of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Coppin State University, Baltimore, Mariland USA
Uchenna AKPOM, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, The University of West Alabama
This paper explores the relationship between military spending and household consumption for a panel of fifteen African countries. Specifically, the study seeks to ascertain the substitutability or complementarity effects of military spending on household consumption using the panel Granger causality tests. The results from the unit root and cointegration tests indicate that the military spending and household consumption series have one order of integration as well as cointegrated. The Granger causality test results reveal that there is evidence of long run bidirectional causality between military spending and household consumption for the entire panel. The results from the Panel Dynamic OLS indicate that military spending and household consumption positively influence each other in the long run. Taken together, the results suggest that military spending and household consumption are complementary.
Military Spending, Household Consumption, Causality, Cointegration
Boulding, K. (1973), The Impact of the Defense Industry on the Structure of the American Economy, in: B. Udis (Ed.), “The Economic Consequences of Reduced Military Spending”, Lexington Books: Lexington.
Breitung, J. (2005), “A Parametric Approach to the Estimation of Cointegrating Vectors in Panel Data”, Econometric Reviews, 24(2), 151-73.
Breitung, J. and S. Das (2005), “Panel Unit Root Tests under Cross Sectional Dependence”, Statistica Neerlandica, 59(4), 414-433.
Canning, D. and P. Pedroni (2008), “Infrastructure, Long-run Economic Growth and Causality Tests for Cointegrated Panels”, The Manchester School, 76(5), 504-527.
Edelstein, M. (1990), “What Price Cold War? Military Spending and Private Investment in the US, 1946–1979”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), 421-437.
Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger (1987), “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
Evans, P. and G. Karras (1998), “Liquidity Constraints and the Substitutability between Private and Government Consumption: The Role of Military and Non-military Spending” Economic Inquiry, 36(2), 203-214.
Feenstra, R.C., R. Inklaar and M. Timmer (2013), “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table”, available for download at <http://www.rug.nl/research/ggdc/data/pwt/v80/the_next_generation_of_the_penn_world_table.pdf >.
Fisher, R. A. (1932), Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 4th Edition, Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh.
Fleissig, A. and R. Rossana (2003), “Are Consumption and Government Expenditures Substitutes or Complements? Morishima Elasticity Estimates from the Fourier Flexible Form”, Economic Inquiry, 41(1), 132-146.
Gold, D. (1997), “Evaluating the Trade?off between Military Spending and Investment in the United States”, Defense and Peace Economics, 8(3), 251-266.
Hasani S.M. and A. Kashmari (2008), “Impact of Government Defense Spending on Economic Growth and its Indirect Effect on Private Consumption in Iran: Survey of Supply-Side Approach”, The Economic Research, 8(2), 25-40.
Johansen, S. (1991), “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models”, Econometrica, 59(6), 1551-1580.
Johansen, S. (1995), Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inferences on Cointegration—with Applications to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
Looney, R. (1989), “Impact of Arms Production on Income Distribution and Growth in the Third World”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 38(1), 145-153.
Mark, N. and D. Sul (2003), “Cointegration Vector Estimation by Panel DOLS and Long-run Money Demand”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(5), 655-680.
Moon, H.R. and B. Perron (2004), “Testing for a Unit Root in Panels with Dynamic Factors”, Journal of Econometrics, 122(1), 81-126.
Pechman, J. (1971), Federal Tax Policy, Norton: New York.
Pedroni, P. (2000), “Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels”, Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93-130.
Pedroni, P. (2001), “Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727-731.
Penn World Tables (PWT) 8.0, available for download at <www.ggdc.net/pwt>.
Pesaran, M. and R. Smith (1995), “Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panel”, Journal of Econometrics 68(1), 79-113.
Pieroni, L. (2009), “Does Defense Expenditure Affect Private Consumption? Evidence from the United States”, Economic Modelling, 26(6), 1300-1309.
Samadi. A. and S.M. Seyyedi (2013), “The Impact of Income Inequality on Private Consumption (Case Study of MENA Region)”, Economic Modeling Research Quarterly Periodical, 8: 58-86.
SIPRI (2012), Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Military Expenditure Database, <http://milexdata.sipri.org/> [Accessed: 12 June 2015].
Westerlund, J. (2007), “Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748.